Last week, a massive storm system spawned numerous tornadoes spanning several states. The destruction is still being calculated. The unprecedented event resulted in 337 confirmed deaths. Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Georgia, Virginia, Louisiana, and Kentucky were battered by the nation’s deadliest tornado disaster in 86 years, and the second deadliest in American history.
For those in a position to help, the Legislative Barbie blog has compiled some great lists of organizations accepting financial and material donations; and volunteer opportunities for those with time, talent and skill available.
I urge you to join us in offering whatever assistance you can to provide relief to the thousands of Americans who have been so profoundly affected by this disaster. Thank you.
In his post: Network as Computer – Part 1, Dillon Hawkins detailed some of the history and concepts behind thin client computing. In Part 2, Dillon shared his impressions of Google’s implementation of the thin client model, called Chrome OS. This post is intended to provide an additional voice and — in some cases — an alternate perspective.
I, like Dillon, happened to be one of the lucky testers to receive a Cr-48 Chrome OS notebook. I was super excited for it and ready to get started. I booted it up, synced my bookmarks and was ready to go. The whole process only took a few minutes and I felt like I was home, everything was in its place. This speaks more to the power of the Chrome browser and the syncing technology that Google has built. This same technology, or at least the spirit of syncing, has really picked up in the last few years. In my mind, “network as computer” now relies less on a specific device but on a set of services that allow multiple devices to access the same personalized information.
While Chrome OS seemed to me a very ambitious idea when it was first announced, it has — in my opinion — taken a back seat to the Android operating system and the latest and greatest from Apple. The iPad and the recently upgraded iPad 2, has completely challenged opinions of what is possible without a full-fledged desktop computer. Netbooks helped pave the way, but they were easily crowded out by more advanced mobile phones and more compact laptops. Netbooks also gained traction over the last two to three years due to their low price and compact size. These cheap, underpowered devices offered an easy way for people to get online. Their low-power processors and budget hardware didn’t allow for much more than web surfing and light office work. For this reason, they were easily replaced by a somewhat lesser device (no physical keyboard, no camera, no real input or expandable storage options) that allowed users to do more than what they had previously thought possible.
Getting back to the Chrome OS notebook: I used it for a few days to catch up on RSS feeds, Twitter and Facebook, and watch a few YouTube videos. It is more than adequate at those tasks, but so is my Android phone. The lack of a Silverlight plugin prevented me from watching Netflix, but that’s what my TV + Xbox are for. My wife needed a computer to use while we were watching TV and I needed to use my real laptop for development, the Cr-48 was perfect for her. She needed access to Facebook, Google Reader, Blogger, etc. the Chrome OS notebook excels at those things. She has become the primary user of the “spy laptop,” as we call it, due to its matte black soft-touch finish with no markings. I had converted her to the way of Google Chrome a few months back, so she too was up and running with all of her bookmarks and settings within minutes. Life was good for the Chrome OS notebook, it got a solid few months of almost daily use from her, until she got an Android phone. It still gets fired up every few days for “normal” web browsing that doesn’t look so good on a small screen, but it has taken a serious back seat. I would probably use it more if I wasn’t always working on side-projects where I need real power and a non-browser-based IDE. I tried using it to teach lessons at church, but my phone proved more convenient, mostly due to its always-on internet connection. While the Cr-48 is limited to 100 MB of free 3G data each month.
Now, I’m not trying to make this post about how awful and inadequate the Cr-48 is, it is more than adequate at web browsing and has a long-lasting battery. It excels at those two points and I’m sure future devices will have faster processors and better trackpads, but the hardware itself doesn’t matter. Google has even released videos of them destroying poor helpless Cr-48s to illustrate that the device is not important because your data lives “in the cloud.”
If the device is destroyed, you don’t lose your data, just the mangled hunk of metal, plastic and silicon. I received a new laptop at work a few months ago — my third since starting — I had the easiest time setting it up and getting ready to start working. My work documents were stored in my company’s personal network space, my personal files were stored in Dropbox, Chrome synced up within a few minutes and I was ready to go, if it wasn’t for the increased processor speed and physical size difference I wouldn’t know I was on a different machine. It was amazing to me how little I needed to install or copy over to be comfortable and ready to work. The hardware doesn’t matter.
From what I’ve seen over the last year, I’d say that Chrome OS doesn’t have a chance up against the likes of Android, iOS, Mac or even Windows as a viable replacement for a fully-capable phone, laptop, or tablet. I love Chrome as a browser and really like the speed at which they are iterating and making it better. Hopefully soon, once the HTML5 spec has figured out its offline storage standard, we’ll be able to use a browser when not connected to a network.
As more things migrate to the cloud such as, Amazon’s CloudPlayer, Dropbox, Google Docs etc. the device I use is less important. The collaborating, and therefore syncing that goes on behind the scenes, makes these services leaps and bounds better than their desktop counterparts. Google’s introduction of Cloud Print with Chrome OS, Android, and iOS has eliminated one of the last hurdles to adopting thin client computing. Thin client computing isn’t a future dream that we have, it is here today. The network is the computer, the future is now.
As you undoubtedly know by now, Japan is reeling from the March 11th earthquake and the resulting tsunami. The scale of this disaster is staggering, as is the estimated death toll. Such events always make the world seem like a smaller place; and we have neighbors in need.
If you’d like to help, I urge you to take action. Two options immediately come to mind. You might search for an opportunity to volunteer at a local organization and provide hands to prepare care packages or other relief supplies. Of course, you can donate money to the American Red Cross or another organization that is contributing to relief efforts.
For the past ten years, women engineers have introduced more than one million girls and young women to engineering. More than just one day, Introduce a Girl to Engineering is a national movement that shows girls how creative and collaborative engineering is and how engineers are changing our world.
We can’t wait to see how all you engineers, educators and parents will join us this year in taking time to introduce girls and young women to engineering. I’ve long believed — and stated before — that it isn’t simply that women are underrepresented in science, technology, engineering or mathematics (STEM) career paths; but that to improve life and stay competitive, America desperately needs the insight, talent and skill that this next generation of young women have to offer.
Consider this a challenge to participate! Visit Engineer Your Life and Engineer Girl to find interesting ways to introduce a girl or young woman in your life to engineering. Whether you need a little help, or just want to share with us the creative things you come up with for Introduce a Girl to Engineering Day, please be sure contact us so we can learn more about the girls and young women who inspire you.
In a nutshell: Microsoft Bing uses data captured by the Suggested Sites feature in Internet Explorer and/or the Bing Toolbar to provide and rank search results on Bing. This in itself isn’t the issue — unless you’re an IE or Bing Toolbar user and didn’t previously realize what you’d opted in to. At issue are the experiments that Google conducted that they say prove that Bing is not simply using the collected data to inform their site indexing process; but instead establish that Bing is actually copying Google search results and displaying them as their own.
The Bing team’s response to Google’s accusations frames the process taking place as a crowdsource/clickstream hybrid instead of a straight-up copy operation; and I’ll bet Bing hasn’t limited their efforts to Google — search engines, even. Best-case scenario for Bing’s reputation: They’ve been factoring all browsing activity that users have permitted in Bing’s own site indexing and ranking logic, and anonymizing the data prior to acquisition. If this is the case, users have agreed to play a part; and one could reasonably argue that Bing is simply trying to serve those users well by using unconventional means to improve the experience of using their product.
As a developer and a user, I find myself sympathizing with Google’s position that Bing is doing something it shouldn’t. If Bing has in fact, targeted Google as a source for content and page rank, then it begs one to ask a few questions. If users can depend on Google to find the same content, is Bing really providing value? If Yahoo was willing to ink a deal with Bing prior to publishing Bing results on Yahoo properties, doesn’t it suggest that Bing should be willing to treat Google search results as something deserving valuation and requiring permission for use? Are search results on Bing — or by proxy, Yahoo — really the result of Google’s tech often enough to characterize Bing’s actions as stealing instead of competing?
If Bing is simply leveraging permitted, aggregated user behavior to benefit its users, I’ll probably file this episode away as a non-issue. If instead, Bing is cheating and stealing from Google, Bing deserves every bit of criticism and consequence it has coming.
Update – 2/7/2011: In a follow-up article on February 4, 2011, Bing: Why Google’s Wrong In Its Accusations, Danny Sullivan recounts his discussions with Bing’s Harry Shum and Stefan Weitz following the publication of the February 1st article discussed above. While Mr. Sullivan seems to give Bing a fair hearing, his conclusions are ambiguous. From my perspective, the account of Google’s accusations continues to move toward the “non-issue” category I discussed last week. Through Mr. Sullivan’s articles, we may have learned more about novel techniques search engines are using to provide relevant results, but we also witnessed over-eagerness result in a catalyst for sensationalism.
I wasn’t surprised by the techniques being employed by Bing, I wasn’t surprised that Google took issue with them, and I’m not surprised by Bing’s response. I was surprised however, that Mr. Sullivan decided to publish his first article without including the kind of detail he provided in the second. Until I hear otherwise, I’ll afford Mr. Sullivan the benefit of the doubt and assume that he made an effort to get a response from Bing, and details were not forthcoming.
Tact, discretion and balance are important components of journalism and blogging; and if they were underutilized in this case, we — journalists and bloggers alike — should all use this example to remind ourselves to stay disciplined.